Tag Archives: satellite radio

Sprint Gets Sirius

(Cue the sound of Nelson Muntz from The Simpsons saying “Ha ha!” based on my oh-so-witty headline.)

So, getting back to the commentary on alternative distribution for content offered by Sirius and XM, it seems that Sirius have struck a deal to offer selected content to Sprint PCS customers. This is, evidently, going to be achieved via streaming digital audio content to mobiles.

I’m still a bit skeptical that we’re to a price point yet where customers would want to pay for the limited quality available via a mobile phone network. I think carriers have a tough story to tell with respect to sound quality. This is why I think the real value of the Motorola/Apple iPhone will be to let users bypass the carriers’ networks by trading songs with their PCs using Bluetooth. Even then I’m still somewhat wary that a phone has the proper form factor to make it an enjoyable music device.

It’s still good to see the satellite radio networks pursue alternative distribution. I’m just not sure this is the right way to go. I think Podcasting content (we all KNOW that it’s coming) would provide more bang for the buck with lower costs and without having to appease partners as touchy as the wireless carriers.

Sirius + Apple = Podcasting

There’s been a good amount written on the web about how Apple and Sirius are going to work to include Podcast feeds of some Sirius programming as Podcasts for incorporation into the iTunes Music Store and iTunes’ forthcoming ability to support podcasts. I won’t both to link to any of the specific articles, but here’s a somewhat related article from Forbes about why radio must change.

I’m glad to see the satellite radio companies doing those things they need to do to go beyond a hardware-based distribution message to a content-based distribution method. In hindsite my entry on how XM and Sirius needed to change seems almost kind of like a “duh” statement. The fact that it does says good things, I think, about their strategic management. How many times has the MPAA or RIAA flows right past a “duh” opportunity to legislate and litigate to maintain the status quo?

XM Seeks Alternate Distribution Channels

First XM struck a deal with AOL for distribution of select channels via AOL, and now they’re talking to wireless carriers. I’m still not sure about the mobile as a delivery for radio content, partly as a result of form factor and partly because of carriers’ typical “wallled garden” approach to content. I guess we’ll see.

XM Partners with AOL

Per my last entry it looks like XM are pursuing alternate channels to distribute their content. XM have partnered with AOL to offer their content to AOL subscribers and others over the Internet.

It looks like XM is also going to get some of AOL’s radio content as part of the deal.

While this isn’t one of the three recommendations or thoughts I had about satellite radio, it looks like a smart move on the part of XM. This looks like less of a content distribution deal than a promotional opportunity for XM. AOL customers connecting over broadband will have access to XM content which could provide a strong motivator to subscribe to XM.

Meditating on Satellite Radio

There was an article today in the New York Times talking about how satellite radio is forcing commercial broadcast radio to change. This was an interesting read and gave me a moment to focus on some thoughts Ive been having about satellite radio recently.

Begin Product Placement

The thoughts were driven in part by a laoner car given to me by the local Acura dealership while I was having some work done on my own vehicle. The laoner had XM radio, and I found myself channel surfing among the 80s, 90s, dance and news channels during my drive. I have to say that I was impressed by the ability to manage my adult-onset attention deficit across a subset of XM channels. It takes a mighty arsenal of music and news to keep me sated, and XM did a pretty good job of it.

End Product Placement

Theres something that concerns me about satellite radio, though. I have to wonder if the business model for XM and Sirius is tied too tightly to the technical method of distribution for their programming. I really enjoyed their programming, and I dont see any reason why much of it could be delivered over terrestrial airwaves once digital radio takes off.

The Times article points out that major radio networks are looking at digital radio (or HD Radio as the Washington Post tried to brand terrestrial digital radioyuck) to offer subscription-based services with fewer commercial offerings. As much as I dislike commercial broadcast radio today I can recognize the potential competition that the medium will present for satellite radio at the cutting edge of broadcast technology.

One of the things I think XM and Sirius need to do is to begin to offer some of their content on a subscription basis via a terrestrial, digital broadcast infrastructure. This will go a long way to alleviating the challenge from digital radio. XM have already proven (at least to me) that they get the programming side of the game.

Secondly, I think XM and Sirius have an opportunity to deliver a more realistic kind of content over their satellite infrastructure. Being broadcast over airwaves not regulated (or less regulated, anyway) than terrestrial broadcasts allows the programming to be truer, more realistic and (lets face it) more raunchy than any terrestrial broadcast services will be able to provide.

Thirdly, I would love to see XM and Sirius move towards offering subscriptions to individual channels across both platforms. In other words, if I am an XM customer, but I want to listen to Howard Stern, I can subscribe to that channel from Sirius and receive it over the equipment I already have installed on my vehicle.

Finally, and this is something I believe XM and Sirius both have done very well is their ability to serve national radio audiences such as major league baseball fans and over-the-road truck drivers with specific content for their consumption.

So, those are my thoughts on satellite radio.