I need to caveat my comments on this article with a recognition that there is a dispute over how these conversations between BellSouth and the city government of New Orleans have played out. According to an article in todays Washington Post, the New Orleans mayors office is claiming that BellSouth has angrily withdrawn an offer to donate a damaged building to be a temporary headquarters for the New Orleans police. The stated reason is BellSouths extreme anger over the citys plan to roll out a municipal Wi-Fi network.
Hours after New Orleans officials announced Tuesday that they would deploy a city-owned, wireless Internet network in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, regional phone giant BellSouth Corp. withdrew an offer to donate one of its damaged buildings that would have housed new police headquarters, city officials said yesterday.
According to the officials, the head of BellSouth’s Louisiana operations, Bill Oliver, angrily rescinded the offer of the building in a conversation with New Orleans homeland security director Terry Ebbert, who oversees the roughly 1,650-member police force.
City officials said BellSouth was upset about the plan to bring high-speed Internet access for free to homes and businesses to help stimulate resettlement and relocation to the devastated city. Around the country, large telephone companies have aggressively lobbied against localities launching their own Internet networks, arguing that they amount to taxpayer-funded competition. Some states have laws prohibiting them.
BellSouth spokesman Jeff Battcher disputed the city’s version of events.
“Our willingness to work with the mayor and the city is still on the table,” Battcher said. “We’ve been working for over two months on this building . . . we are a little surprised by these comments.
Ive been really down on the RBOCs as of late, particularly in their comments regarding network neutrality and their efforts to counter municipal Wi-Fi. Granted the RBOCs have deserved the criticism, but I am going to give BellSouth the benefit of the doubt on this one. I can think of any number of reasons why there may be a delay or hiccups in the handover of a facility (many involving things like legal liability for a potentially damaged facility). I can see where someone within the city government might have come to the wrong conclusion about the reasons behind that delay. I am finding it hard to believe that a business leader or company would risk the bad PR by being such a complete asshole in a situation like this. This is particularly so for executives and a company operating within such a disaster situation. Bad PR aside, Ive got to believe a sense of humanity trumps the profit motive in situations like this.