augustjackson dot net

Entries tagged as ‘digital media’

DailyTechRag calls AC/DC – VZW Deal “Craptacular”

2 August 2007 · Leave a Comment

The daily tech news aggregation and commentary DailyTechRag does a god job describing the AC/DC – Verizon Wireless deal.  They have more detail than my previous posting did and actually correct one thing that I did not know.  Evidently the song “Shook my All Night Long” will be the only AC/DC song available as a single.

My spirit was embiggened by their use of the Simpson-inspired phrase “craptacular.”  It’s a very cromulent description of this deal.

AC/DC–not the electrical current acronym but rather, the hellraising purveyors of ’70s hard rock–have apparently decided to extend their bad boy ways well into the digital age. Eschewing the usual iTunes deal, the band has decided to sign a contract (presumably in blood) with Verizon Wireless for the exclusive digital distribution of their music.

So, what do AC/DC fans get out of the deal? Well, you can now purchase all of AC/DC’s albums from Verizon–but only as albums, there will be no single track sales (with the exception of ”You Shook Me All Night Long,” the only single that will be sold as an individual download). Well, at least those albums will be
priced to move, right? Wrong. At $12 a pop, these puppies are going to be more expensive than iTunes albums–heck, they’re even more expensive than physical copies of the same albums on CD from Amazon. But for $12, you’ve got to own these things for real… right? Wrong again, my friend: the tracks will be available only through your VCast account and will not actually download to your handset. So let’s recap: for
more than the price of the same album on a CD, you gain the ability to stream songs (that you probably already own in another form) over Verizon’s network to your handset … and that’s it. I’m sure AC/DC and
Verizon are going to be laughing all the way to whatever the opposite of a bank is thanks to this brilliant strategy.

Categories: CI
Tagged: , , ,

AC/DC Only on Verizon Wireless– Everybody Asks “WTF?” All At Once

1 August 2007 · Leave a Comment

In a move that completely baffles me, AC/DC’s record label Columbia Records have chosen to make the band’s catalog available to Verizon Wireless’s music download service and explicitly flipped Apple’s iTunes the bird.  In a decision even more baffling, it doesn’t look like single-track downloads will be available, and a body will need to purchase whole albums.

Would the label really want to sell that little music?  

  • Put it on a music service that comparatively few people use (with all due apologies to my employer– don’t hate the mirror if you have an ugly face, guys).
  • Require customers to download the VCAST music client.
  • Apply DRM that allows the song only to be played on a small number of mobile phones when hundreds of millions of people own other music players and comparatively few music phones have been sold.
  • Sell it only as an ALBUM as opposed to singles when customers have clear expectation that songs will be available in single form.
  • Make an EXCLUSIVE distribution agreement in general is just lame, lame, lame.  I even dislike artists that make exclusive arrangements with iTunes.  It’s nonsense to lock content to specific platforms for no real reason.  NOBODY wins when that happens.  It’s just nuts!

According to the Wall Street Journal (still Cavuto-free for the moment) Verizon Wireless SVP for marketing and digital media, crowed, “You won’t be able to get this through any other mobile carrier and you certainly won’t be able to get it through iTunes.”  Sadly for Verizon Wireless, the market segment to which AC/DC is likely to appeal (I would say I am on the very young end of that market at 32 years young) is not the same segment that is buying the VCAST music phones.  There is a big disconnect here.

In the face of such rejection of customer expectations, those of us who purchased the cassettes in the 1980s and CDs in the 1990s really couldn’t be blamed for going to free P2P networks.

Categories: Technology
Tagged: , , ,

Universal Will Punish Apple by Hurting Universal Shareholders

2 July 2007 · Leave a Comment

Last November I speculated that Microsoft’s agreement to pay Universal Music Group for each Zune they sold as a form of recompense for expectations of music piracy and vary the price for songs were actually shots fired across the bow of Apple iTunes.

Today I read in the Wall Street Journal that Universal Music Group is looking to avoid long-term contracts with Apple for the sale of Universal artists’ music on iTunes. Never mind that iTunes is now the 3rd largest music retailer in the United States?

Highlighting continuing tension between the music industry and Apple Inc., Vivendi SA’s Universal Music Group is considering notifying the Cupertino, Calif., company that it isn’t renewing a long-term contract to sell digital-music downloads through the increasingly powerful iTunes Store, according to a person familiar with the situation.

Aside from continuing complaints that digital music encourages or enables piracy, Universal have been one of the most vocal record labels criticizing Apple’s $0.99/song pricing scheme.

Practically since the launch of the iTunes store in 2003, Apple and the four major record labels have been at loggerheads over two critical issues: pricing and the lack of so-called interoperability between downloads sold by iTunes competitors and Apple’s popular iPod. Apple from the start insisted on selling all downloads for 99 cents each. Record labels wanted to sell some music for more, other music for less.

I continue to be amazed by the ability of music industry executives to continue to fight battles that they’ve already lost, and now Universal seems perfectly willing to hurt their own sales and stockholders in a continued battle with Apple over flat-rate pricing.

Technorati Tags: iTunes, Competitive Inteligence

Categories: CI
Tagged: , ,

UMG May Seek iPod Kickback from Apple

4 December 2006 · Leave a Comment

I can’t say that I’m surprised to have come accross this Reuters article indicating that Universal Music Group are indeed openly considering demanding a kickback from Apple for iPod sales.

Universal Music Group Chief Executive Doug Morris said on Tuesday he may try to fashion an iPod royalty fee with Apple Computer Inc. in the next round of negotiations in early 2007.

“It would be a nice idea. We have a negotiation coming up not too far. I don’t see why we wouldn’t do that… but maybe not in the same way,” he told the Reuters Media Summit, when asked if Universal would negotiate a royalty fee for the iPod that would be similar to Microsoft’s Zune.

It seems that one part of Microsoft’s strategic game play with the Zune is coming to fruition. It is going to be very interesting to see how Apple will respond.

If my hypothesis about Microsoft’s deliberate “mistakes” in their Zune strategy have the desired effect on Apple we will see significant growth in consumer awareness and concern about DRM (particularly among non-tech geeks) and increased pressure from record companies for variable pricing of songs in the iTunes store.

Technorati Tags: Zune, Competitive Intelligence.

Categories: CI
Tagged: , , ,

Zune You and the Horse You Rode in on

27 November 2006 · Leave a Comment

The Microsoft Zune portable digital music player has been receiving some extremely mixed reviews. Leo Laporte from TWiT claims to love the form factor and the hardware, but even Leo joins in the nearly universal criticism of the Zune’s digital rights management scheme and music store ecosystem. The most common complaints about the Zune I’ve seen are:

  • Microsoft’s change in digital rights management (DRM) for the Zune so that music purchased under Microsoft’s earlier PlaysForSure DRM scheme will not play on the Zune. This includes Naptster, Rhapsody and– most annoyingly– MSN Music. If you bought a lot of music from the MSN Music store you are going to have to buy your music all over again to play it on the Zune.
  • The Zune can only synchronize using Zune software and not with Windows Media Player.
  • There will be no driver for the Zune when Microsoft’s new Vista operating system ships.
  • The Zune’s sharing feature allows Zune users to send songs to one another via Wi-Fi. They have a limited number of days or listens before the song expires. Even song files not purchased from the Zune store will have Zune DRM applied to them when users share them. For Creative Commons and other content the application of DRM schemes is actually a violation of the license, and in general this means users have a limited ability to share even their own homemade content with friends.
  • The Zune store does not use dollars but rather uses points, such that 1 point does not equal 1 cent. The minimum amount a user can add to their Zune store balance is $5 worth of points, so users are constantly being required to top up their accounts or leave excess points in their account. Anybody who has been to Taste of Chicago will be familiar with this concept.
  • Microsoft are paying Universal Music Group some small fee (I think $3) for every Zune sold as a sort of “piracy tax.”

(I am reminded of the “Bad Idea Jeans” commercial from Saturday Night Live in the early 1990s.)

Some reviewers of the Zune have been particularly brutal. Of note is this review from the Chicago Sun-Times which was brought to my attention by Slashdot Review:

“Avoid,” is my general message. The Zune is a square wheel, a product that’s so absurd and so obviously immune to success that it evokes something akin to a sense of pity.

Dude, harsh.

It is very hard to believe that the smart people at Microsoft could have produced such a flawed product with such a poor excuse for a commercial ecosystem. After all, this is the same team that developed the Xbox 360, and that thing is great.

I actually have started to wonder if there isn’t some degree of game theory going on at Microsoft. I wonder if they aren’t falling on their swords to put Apple, the iPod and the iTunes commercial ecosystem at a disadvantage in customer perception and with the music industry.

Owners of the iPod tend not to think about the consequences of DRM, for good or for bad. Apple have done a pretty good job of keeping the downside to copy-protected music and video hidden from the user by integrating the portable device, the computer software and the buying experience together so well. The fact that PlaysForSure does not function on the Zune is likely to raise the realization that DRM exists and is very limiting when you want to move from one platform or device to another. Users are likely to ask “Will my iTunes play on my Zune/Nokia/whatever if I switch?” Since the answer is a resounding “No” users are going to be much less willing to buy music from iTunes even if they own an iPod. All of a sudden Apple’s grip on the iPod nation is loosened just a little bit because users realize for the first time that they’re actually locked into something. The nonsense with strict DRM applied to shared songs only makes this more apparent to anyone who knows anyone who is unfortunate enough to own a Zune. Inoperability with Windows Media Player and the lack of availability of a driver for Vista have a similar chilling effect– “What happens to my music if Apple discontinues iTunes for my platform or I move to a platform that does not have a version of iTunes (such as Linux)?” You’re out of luck, that’s what happens. Techies have known all of this stuff for a long time, and now the average user is going to get a lesson in the perils of DRM.

The funky point system is there so that the Zune store can offer variable pricing for songs, or so says Microsoft. So, a song from the back catalog might cost you 77 points, the current chart-toppers will cost you 115 points, or somesuch. Apple has long resisted this sort of pricing scheme, holding firm to the $0.99/song price. The recording companies have long-lobbied Apple for some sort of variable pricing mechanism. With variable pricing being offered by Microsoft, the record companies will be emboldened in their negotiations with Apple.

The fee paid to Universal Music Group is particularly interesting. This has the potential to give the recording companies the idea that they should get a similar kickback from the manufacturers of all digital music players. Since Apple is the big dog they are a juicy target.

Having not played with the Zune myself I cannot comment on direct experience with the device or ecosystem that surrounds it. The reviews don’t exactly make it sound very appealing, but the more I think about it the more I wonder if all of these supposed mis-steps are not the real point of the Zune.

Technorati Tags: Zune, Competitive Intelligence.

Categories: CI
Tagged: , , ,