<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality One More Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://augustjackson.net/2007/01/26/net-neutrality-one-more-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://augustjackson.net/2007/01/26/net-neutrality-one-more-time/</link>
	<description>Your home on the Internet for competitive intelligence, tech punditry and bad spelling.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:14:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forbes gets Amazon &#8211; Sprint Relationship Wrong? &#171; augustjackson dot net</title>
		<link>http://augustjackson.net/2007/01/26/net-neutrality-one-more-time/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forbes gets Amazon &#8211; Sprint Relationship Wrong? &#171; augustjackson dot net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augustjackson.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] June 2009 &#183; No Comments  Back in January 2007 I wrote a blog entry trying to explain the basics of network neutrality one more time.  This was in response to a Forbes column by Peter Huber that claimed Content Delivery Networks [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] June 2009 &middot; No Comments  Back in January 2007 I wrote a blog entry trying to explain the basics of network neutrality one more time.  This was in response to a Forbes column by Peter Huber that claimed Content Delivery Networks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Wants Its Own Fast Track on the Web - WSJ.com &#171; augustjackson dot net</title>
		<link>http://augustjackson.net/2007/01/26/net-neutrality-one-more-time/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Wants Its Own Fast Track on the Web - WSJ.com &#171; augustjackson dot net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augustjackson.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] models taken directly to the carrier network.  I&#8217;ve tried to make the case before that traditional models for content delivery acceleration such as services provided by Akamai and similar... (or at least perhaps my own narrow and admittedly vague and evolving definition of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] models taken directly to the carrier network.  I&#8217;ve tried to make the case before that traditional models for content delivery acceleration such as services provided by Akamai and similar&#8230; (or at least perhaps my own narrow and admittedly vague and evolving definition of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

